Sheehan, revised. Comparison with Classical Texts. No one would ever have thought of questioning the integrity of the Gospel texts, but for the fact that they contain a Divine Law of belief and conduct, irksome to the irreligious. Whoever would dismiss the New Testament must logically reject all written sources of ancient history and literature. War B. New Testament A. In the entire range of ancient literature, the Iliad of Homer, committed to writing possibly in the 7th century B.
Redating New Testament by John Robinson
Fact one: the bibliographical test corroboration from textual transmission. The historical accuracy of the New Testament can be proven by subjecting it to three generally accepted tests for determining historical reliability. Such tests are utilized in literary criticism and the study of historical documents in general.
These are also discussed by Sanders.
For Further Reading: The Making of the New Testament: Origin, Collection, Text & Canon In many circles, it is common to date Mark c. Many years ago, Bishop John A. T. Robinson suggested that all the books in the NT were written before.
The historicity of the resurrection is firmly rooted in the reliability of the New Testament documents. If it can be shown that the NT documents are unreliable, then the case for the resurrection goes out the window. If, however, it can be demonstrated that the NT documents are historically accurate and were written down during the lifetime of the eyewitnesses to the life and resurrection of Jesus, then the truth claim of Christianity is affirmed. External evidence would include the number and dating of the available NT manuscripts as well as archaeological evidence that serves to affirm or debunk the early composition of the New Testament.
The first will be the evidence furnished by the MSS themselves. We have today in our possession 5, known Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, another 10, Latin Vulgates, and 9, other early versions MSS , giving us more than 24, manuscript copies of portions of the New Testament in existence today! Though we do not have any originals, with such a wealth of documentation at our disposal with which to compare, we can delineate quite closely what those originals contained.
In fact, when we compare the works of antiquity with that of the NT documents, we will then see how superior the New Testament really is in terms of dating and number of MSS.
Subscribe to RSS
This refers to the challenge to the earlier, I think much looser, dating of the New Testament which was around prior to something like the s. The challenge came from J. Robinson Robinson definitely came from the more liberal tradition of Anglicanism, and wrote many things which many of us would not support, however, his redating of the New Testament was, in the opinion of many of us, long overdue and it solved many former problems and questions.
He believed that AD70 was a pivotal year for the early church with the destruction of the temple at Jerusalem and found it quite staggering that that event would have gone unmentioned in those books which had been believed to have been written very late, such as the epistles of John and the Book of Revelation. Indeed, the temple was referred to by the Apostle John in Revelation 11 as though it were still standing.
A careful consideration of the likely dates at which the New Testament documents John A. T. Robinson wrote a revolutionary book titled Redating the New.
Along with Harvard theologian Harvey Cox , he spearheaded the field of secular theology and, like William Barclay , he was a believer in universal salvation. Robinson was born on 16 May in the precincts of Canterbury Cathedral , England, where his father was a canon. He was educated at Marlborough College , then an all-boys’ independent school in Marlborough, Wiltshire. Robinson was ordained in the Church of England as a deacon in and as a priest in Following an invitation from Stockwood, by then the Bishop of Southwark , Robinson became the Bishop of Woolwich in In Robinson served as a witness for the defence in the obscenity trial of Penguin Books for the publication of D.
Lawrence ‘s Lady Chatterley’s Lover. Following a ten-year period at Woolwich, Robinson returned to Cambridge in as Fellow and Dean of Chapel at Trinity College , where he did not hold a teaching post but lectured and continued to write. Robinson was diagnosed with terminal cancer in  and died on 5 December of that year in Arncliffe, North Yorkshire.
Dating the New Testament books
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we’ll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer – no Kindle device required. And the trail is indeed long, but by no means laborious, for Dr Robinson’s style is easy, even conversational. His book is a prodigious virtuoso exercise in inductive reasoning, and an object-lesson in the nature of historical argument and historical knowledge.
It is, I think, the finest of all his writings, and its energy is marvellous’ TheListener. The rumour of this revolutionary conclusion has already given the book notoriety and led some either to dismiss it out of hand or to lose patience with what is taken to be frivolous donnish antics.
Redating the New Testament by ROBINSON, John A.T. and a great selection of related books, art and collectibles available now at.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Redating the New Testament by John A. Get A Copy. Paperback , pages.
The Old Testament books were of course written well before.
the New Testament books in the form that we now have them. This is particularly The Gospel of John is given a composition date in the 90’s. One may be Robinson in his scholarly work Redating the New Testament is of great importance.
Post a comment. I say “at last,” because in the introductory chapter he had noted that it was doubts about the standard dating of this literature to the 90s that led him on the course of research that eventuated in Redating. That his real interest is ultimately in the dates of these four texts is reinforced by the fact that his next, and last, monograph was The Priority of John , which although not quite complete at the time of his passing was published posthumously.
In this blog post, I’ll focus specifically upon the Gospel of John, and in another upon the letters. An initial word must be given regarding Robinson’s use of “priority. What Robinson means however is something closer to what I would call “primitivity. This is crucial for dating purposes, because it was the idea that John represented an advanced Christianity that led F. Baur to date it into the late-2nd century.
A date that late is today a non-starter, largely due to the work of J. Lightfoot a generation after Baur, but there remains a lingering supposition that John must come last of all the gospels, and must be late enough to allow its advanced theology to develop although how we can know whether that development must have taken sixty years rather than thirty, I’ve never been entirely clear.
Robinson makes much the same point with regard specifically to Brown’s five-stage theory of the development of John’s Gospel: one could in fact affirm those five stages and date the gospel to the 60s rather than the 90s, as Brown insists one must do. Robinson affirms and builds upon the work of C. Dodd, which aimed to show that John in fact builds extensively upon an early, “primitive,” tradition that was in direct contact with the Jewish-Christian circles of the first Christian generation.
Where he moves beyond Dodd is in asking why, if on Dodd’s own arguments, everything that in John’s Gospel could have existed by 70, does Dodd need to place the gospel in the 90s, following the consensus position built by Lightfoot.
Redating the NEW TESTAMENT By John A.T. Robinson
Seventh-day Adventists believe in inspiring those around us to experience a life of wholeness and hope for an eternal future with God. It isn’t often that the liberal critics from the left of Biblical scholarship comfort and support the conservative right. Yet the Anglican cleric John A. Robinson, whose popular book Honest to God scandalized the religious world of two decades past, has turned the weapons of Biblical criticism against the positions of fellow liberals in his new book Redating the New Testament.
His temerarious propositions assert that every book in the New Testament may well have reached its present form before A. Robin son’s backward march sometimes travels more than one hundred years from the positions commonly held in liberal circles.
Before proceeding, I should acknowledge the book, Redating the New Testament, by Bishop John Robinson. In addition to the fact that this web site has a very.
Perhaps I am a hideliberated apologist, but when I approach dates, I tend to have a bigger range than most. In my Acts, piece, for example, I conclude that Acts was written “somewhere between 62 and 90 A. Sometimes we should be satisfied with a 30 year range and hope for further illumination. As for Robinson, it sounds like you are saying that he engaged in sort of thought experiment and produced arguments accordingly.
Even if true, why is it so unreasonable that some find the arguments produced by the thought experiment persuasive? Most people who find Robinson persuasive refer to the lack of references to the fall of Jerusalem. While this did not convince me that the New Testament books must have been written earlier than 70 AD, it did factor into my decision that the Gospels and Acts might have been written before the event.
Perhaps you could explain why you find the arguments produced by Robinson so unpersuasive. I remember you responding to some of his points at Infidels on one occasion. I thought you made some good ones, but would like to see them again. I found the name of the individual who died while producing a text on dating the NT.